A Montgomery County judge has ruled that an insurance broker and its employee were not entitled to indemnity under their "advertising injury" coverage for a $30 million judgment levied against them in a federal copyright infringement suit. The suit alleged they copied from a rival broker's documents and used it for their own. Judge Ott said the activities alleged in the complaint involve client proposals, rather than materials related to what could traditionally be defined as "advertising."
En savoir plus ? Pour cela, créer GRATUITEMENT votre compte. Dans une seconde, vous pourrez poursuivre votre lecture.
Learn more? If so, create your FREE account. It will take you a second before going back to this paper.
|
OUVRIR MON COMPTE
CREATE MY ACCOUNT
|
déconnexion
retour / back
Autres/Others (MONTGOMERY)
- Subject : Litigations - IP Field : Copyright & neighbouring rights 
Un problème avec cet article ? / A problem with this article?